|Potholes on Thor Ave. in Spokane put this one to shame.|
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Sunday, February 12, 2017
Here is a barf-inducing bit of gun-grabbing liberal bullshit. The duly-elected Sheriff of Spokane County Washington was barred from entering the Spokane Arena – owned and operated by the City of Spokane – because he was on duty and carrying a gun.
|No Guns for You!|
Really – I’m not kidding. The local super-liberal “newspaper” reported on it yesterday: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/feb/11/sheriff-told-to-disarm-before-entering-spokane-are/
For your viewing pleaeure, here is a direct quote from that story:
The no-weapons rule enacted at the Spokane Arena a few months ago snagged an unintended victim Saturday night – Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich.
Knezovich arrived at the arena for the Spokane law enforcement vs. Tri-Cities law enforcement charity event before the Spokane Chiefs hockey game when he was forced to disarm himself before going inside.
“They disarmed me at the door and I’m on duty,” he said. “I had to go put my gun in the car.”
Knezovich said he didn’t have time to argue because he had to get inside, though he plans to follow up with arena officials. “It was just a new level of insanity,” he said. “On-duty police officers do not get disarmed.”
Kevin Twohig, executive director of the Public Facilities District that operates the arena, said he couldn’t comment on the incident because he did not know what had happened. In general, on-duty officers in uniform are allowed to keep their guns, but officers not in uniform are not, he said.
“If they’re not in uniform how would we know they’re on duty?” he said.
Knezovich said he was wearing a suit with a badge on the lapel. The security staff recognized him and were apologetic, he said. “This is atrocious. Every year I go there. Every year I’ve been armed.”
Mind you, he is the Sheriff – not a deputy. And he was on duty. And he was wearing his badge. And he was recognized by the Arena Employee that barred him from entry.
The Spokane County Sheriff’s department is a good-sized organization with hundreds and hundreds of sworn deputies, not to mention another gazillion administrative employees. Ozzie Knezovich is probably the most recognizable person in the Spokane metro area.
Going even further, state law specifically exempts those possessing a valid concealed pistol license, or law enforcement personnel from portions of the state law that regulates firearms in publicly operated arenas and stadiums.
However, since Washington State has been invaded by mush-for-brains liberals for the past few decades, it seems as though the law is no longer the law. The law, or policy, - or whatever the knuckleheads that run Spokane choose to call it - is clearly illegal and unconstitutional on a state level, not to mention a violation of the United States Constitution.
I myself have been barred from entry to this very same city-owned arena unless I was first disarmed after being forced to be wanded, patted down, and scanned by a full-body metal detector.
Just for chuckles, here is a link to the state law: http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.300
Oh yes – did I mention that the City of Spokane Washington is a Sanctuary City as codified by the Spokane Municipal code?
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
The most recent blatant exhibition of wasting the Taxpayer's hard earned dollars is this bit of lunacy:
Fearing Trump campaign promise, Spokane City Council votes 7-0 against religious registry
I'd write a synopsis, however I might upchuck on the keyboard. I urge you to click on the link above and keep your barf-bag nearby.
Of course the local bubble-headed bleached blonde newscasters were all over the story with video of granola-munching tie-dyed and wild-eyed loons testifying at a long and drawn-out city council meeting.
They did get one thing right: "Opponents accused Stuckart (Spokane City Council President and leftest of the lefties) of grandstanding for political purposes and making a boogeyman out of President Donald Trump."
This comes only a few days after the elected overseers of Spokane declared that my soon-to-be-former city is not a sanctuary city. In that vein, consider this:
Spokane Municipal Code Section 03.10.050 Immigrant Status Information:
Unless required by law or court order, no Spokane City officer or employee shall inquire into the immigration status of any person, or engage in activities designed to ascertain the immigration status of any person.
Spokane Police Department officers shall have reasonable suspicion to believe a person has been previously deported from the United States, is again present in the United States, and is committed or has committed a felony criminal-law violation before inquiring into the immigration status of an individual.
The Spokane Police Department shall not investigate, arrest, or detain an individual based solely on immigration status.
The Spokane Police Department shall maintain policies consistent with this section.
In essence, what this means is it is illegal for the police to even check on the immigration status of anyone, unless they find out if they have been previously deported and are in the act of committing a felony. However, since they are prohibited from looking into anyone's immigration status, that very thing is not possible . . . go figure.
Monday, January 30, 2017
The terms "wishful thinking" and "pie-in-the-sky" immediately come to mind. If the boneheads in Washington DC ever did something like this is would blow most folks minds.
Minds: Prepare to be blown!
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday aiming to do just that.
President Trump on Monday signed an executive order that would require agencies to revoke two regulations for every new rule they want to issue.
With the order, Trump followed through on repeated campaign promises to cut rules that he said hold back the economy.
The answer is simple; Obama did it.
President Trump has come under fire for making good on a campaign promise and signing an executive order temporarily halting immigration or re-entries from several Middle Eastern countries where ISIS is known to operate, or that are known to be state sponsors of terrorism. Those countries include Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and Libya.
Earlier this week, left-wing outlets reported the restricted nations do not include those in which the Trump organization has ties, implying that countries like Saudi Arabia were omitted due to their business dealings with Trump.
There's just one problem with this line of reasoning: the Trump Administration did not choose which countries would be restricted.
As a matter of fact, if you read the executive order, the only nation mentioned by name is Syria. All nations affected by the executive order are referred to as "countries of concern", a list of six nations named in a 2016 law signed by President Obama concerning immigration Visas.
The Department of Homeland Security listed those nations in a press release in February of 2016:
The Department of Homeland Security today announced that it is continuing its implementation of the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 with the addition of Libya, Somalia, and Yemen as three countries of concern, limiting Visa Waiver Program travel for certain individuals who have traveled to these countries.
Last month, the United States began implementing changes under the Act. The three additional countries designated today join Iran, Iraq, Sudan and Syria as countries subject to restrictions for Visa Waiver Program travel for certain individuals.
So, did Donald Trump somehow influence the Department of Homeland Security to not include nations he did business with from the list...before he was even president?
Of course not. This was just another left-wing smear. The left was silent when President Obama banned Iraqi refugees for six months in 2011 due to concerns that the program was being used by terrorists to infiltrate the United States
It's also worth noting that there is no "Muslim ban", despite left-wing efforts to frame it as such.
The words "Muslim" or "Islamic" do not appear once in the executive order signed by President Trump. The order restricts entry from specific nations, and not on the basis of faith. This has been done by multiple presidents in the past, including Jimmy Carter in 1980, who invalidated the Visas of Iranians during the Iran Hostage Crisis.
Found at Hannity .com
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
“We’re going to put a lot of … steel workers back to work,” Trump said. “We’ll build our own pipelines, we will build our own pipes.”
He signed other orders related to pipeline construction, including one expediting the environmental permitting process for infrastructure projects and one directing the Commerce Department to maximize the use of U.S. steel.
The moves on the pipelines had been widely expected, as Trump last year blasted his predecessor for effectively blocking the projects.
Republican allies hailed Tuesday’s orders, with House Speaker Paul Ryan saying in a statement, “It’s about time.”
North Dakota Rep. Kevin Cramer said: “Today’s executive orders affirm President Trump’s respect for the rule of law and his support for responsible infrastructure development, energy production and job creation.”
Former President Obama (remember him?) stopped the Keystone XL pipeline in 2015, declaring it would have undercut his legacy of destroying the American economy, while pretending to protect the environment.
The moves come as Trump makes the economy and jobs the centerpiece of his administration’s first week in office.
The pipelines were among the few issues that put the Obama administration at odds with labor unions, some of whom have voiced hope the Trump administration can work with them to promote job creation. Trump said Tuesday during his meeting with auto industry bosses that he considers himself an environmentalist, but called current regulations "out of control."
Sunday, January 15, 2017
When uncivilized people lacking personal restraint introduce themselves upon civilized society, methods other than reason and persuasion are often needed to counter the use of force by amoral barbarians.
As paradoxical as it may seem; a civilized person armed with a weapon of violence may be the only way to prevent the promulgation of violence and mayhem by the uncivilized. When a person is ready, willing, and able to defend themselves against violence with the threat of violence, peace and equity can prevail. Even an uncivilized barbarian must then bend to reason and persuasion as a matter of self preservation.
The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 200-pound rapist, a senior citizen on equal footing with a teenage gangbanger, and one gay man on equal footing with a carload of drunken rednecks. A gun can balance the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a civilized pacifist and an uncivilized aggressor.
Speak softly and carry a big stick.
Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum