Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Sputnik Obama.

CPYTNK, spootnik, sputnik `fellow traveller'



A special meaning of the word developed in Soviet astronomical nomenclature where a heavenly body associated with a larger celestial object like a planet could be a fellow traveler or — a satellite.

The word sputnik is NOT a modern coinage. The word first appears, in the form supotiniku in an ancestor language of modern Russian, a language called in English: Old Church Slavonic. There it is used to translate a Greek word from the New Testament that means `companion on a journey.'

Later in Russian history, but before space exporation in the 1950s, the Russian word sputnik meaning "fellow traveller" came to be a term for one who sympathizes with or supports the tenets and program of the Communist Party, without being an actual card-carryiong member of the Communist party.

The translation of this sense of sputnik entered English too, and in the United States during the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s, the phrase fellow traveller became the label for any American citizen suspected of Communist sympathies.

A "fellow traveler" was a pariah.

Hence, the title of this post.

Sputnik Obama.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Enemies of the People

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first."

- Thomas Jefferson

Friday, April 16, 2010

America Becomes a Two-Class Society

by Phyllis Schlafly April 16, 2010

Income tax day, April 15, 2010, now divides Americans into two almost equal classes: those who pay for the services provided by government and the freeloaders. The percentage of Americans who will pay no federal income taxes at all for 2009 has risen to 47 percent.

That isn't the worst of it. The bottom 40 percent not only pay no income tax, but the government sends them cash or benefits financed by the taxes dutifully paid by those who do pay income tax.

The outright cash handouts include the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which can amount to as much as $5,657 a year to low-income families. Other financial benefits can include child tax credits, welfare, food stamps, WIC (Women, Infants, Children), housing subsidies, unemployment benefits, Medicaid, S-CHIP, and other programs.

This is both a massive transfer of wealth and a soak-the-rich racket. The top 10 percent pay 73 percent of the income taxes collected by the federal government.

Rep Paul Ryan (R-WI) has become the congressional leader in explaining details of the recently passed Health Control Law. He says that, based on Congressional Budget Office figures, taxes to pay for Obamacare will have to skyrocket to an 88 percent income tax rate within 30 years.

Although all wage-earners help fund their own Social Security and Medicare benefits, only federal income taxpayers pay the costs of running the federal government, and are responsible for paying off our $12.8 trillion national debt and for bailing out Social Security, Medicare, and Fannie and Freddie when they collapse.

Even the recently passed Health Control Law contains financial subsidies to unmarried couples that are denied to married couples. This rewards the unmarried women who were the second largest demographic constituency that voted for Obama for President in 2008.

When Obama told Joe the Plumber he wanted to "spread the wealth around," Obama wasn't kidding. That's exactly what he is now doing: taking money from taxpayers and spreading it around to non-taxpayers.

Nor was Obama kidding when, on the eve of his election, he threatened, "We are going to fundamentally transform the United States of America." Converting the earnings of American workers into handouts for those who voted for Obama in 2008 is certainly a fundamental transformation.

Obama's promise not to raise taxes on Middle Americans is already down the drain. Obama brought former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Paul Volcker out of obscurity to serve as chairman of an Economic Recovery Advisory Board and announce that we need to raise taxes.

Volcker was blunt in predicting that the new tax increase will be a Value Added Tax (VAT). That's the tax European Socialists love because its rates can be hidden and frequently raised, while producing rivers of revenue for the bureaucrats.

Volcker claimed that a VAT is "not a toxic idea." It really is; Charles Krauthammer called it "the ultimate cash cow" because it transfers so much money from individuals to the government.

Having already co-opted the executive and legislative branches of government for his fundamental transformation, Obama now wants to use the judiciary, too. The retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens gives him this opportunity.

On January 18, 2001 on Public Radio WBEZ-FM, Chicago, Obama complained that the Earl Warren Court "wasn't that radical" because "It didn't break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution. . . . The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and serve more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society."

Calling for the Supreme Court to participate in the "redistribution of wealth" is shockingly revolutionary. Any judicial nominee who agrees with Obama's theory should be rejected.

Obama's game plan to "fundamentally transform" America is based on both Saul Alinsky's modus operandi for community organizing and on the Cloward-Piven spending strategy. Saul Alinsky was a famous Chicago radical, and Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven were less-well-known Columbia University sociologists.

The goal of all three of these agitators was the overthrow of the private enterprise system. The Alinsky strategy is to use community organizing and mass demonstrations by those he labeled the "Have Nots," and the Cloward-Piven strategy is to overload the bureaucracy with enormous demands for entitlements, thereby causing a financial crisis.

Obama used Alinsky methods by taxpayer financing of ACORN and sub-prime mortgages. Obama used Cloward-Piven methods by massive deficit spending for entitlements for more and more millions of people.

Fortunately, hard-working, taxpaying Americans are beginning to understand how they are being ripped off and rushed into bankruptcy. The one way to save ourselves and our country is to elect a Congress in November pledged to stop the spending.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

The Democrats have torn the country apart numerous times. Which was most grevious?

The civil war.....The democrats wanted to continue slavery.



The 1960s..., The democrats resorted to violence and bombings in their own country.



The present....Their embrace of Socialist/Marxist agenda will finish off America.



Liberals are continuing and expanding slavery by taxing the working class so much they must rely upon their Master's pity for survival.

The very anarchists and communist bombers of the 1960's are the founding fathers of the Liberal's philosophy - appropriately demonstrated by the Bill Ayres wanted poster.

The Obama Administration is bringing all of these anti-American atrocities together. The American Voters are a vast Idiocracy - eagerly ushering in their own assassins and slave masters.

What is it with Obama and his bodily functions...?

Why does Obama humbly have a regular "bow" movement when meeting with foreign leaders, while he arrogantly continues to "pee" on the American people's legs and tell them it's raining?

He is not proud of America.

Remember what His wife said - she had never been proud of America in her life until barack was selected as president.

Remember what his Minister said - God Damn America!

Remember his mentor Bill Ayers (one of the FBI's 10 most wanted criminals) says about America - He hates America so much he bombed and burned her.

No, Barack Obama is embarassed by America. Barack Obama hates America and he is doing his best to tear her down.

To Hell with him and everything he stands for.


Monday, April 5, 2010

Apathy will be the death of Liberty

So, "Conspirators" - What's up?

Been sorta lackadaisical around here lately.

It looks like most everyone has started to nod-off, and roll over in submission.

Have you not noticed that Obama is still in the process of simultaneously ramming it down your throat while Pelosi sticks it up your ass?

Apathy will be the death of Liberty

Public apathy is more powerful than public opinion. There's more of it. - Jim Boren

History assures us that civilizations decay quite leisurely. - Will Durant

It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become prey to the active. The conditions upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt. - John Philpot Curran

As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness. - William O. Douglas

We must not overlook the role that extremists play. They are the gadflies that keep society from being too complacent. - Abraham Flexner

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. - David Hume

We have the greatest opportunity the world has ever seen, as long as we remain honest -- which will be as long as we can keep the attention of our people alive. If they once become inattentive to public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, judges and governors would all become wolves. - Thomas Jefferson

I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of freedoms of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. - James Madison

The biggest conspiracy has always been the fact that there is no conspiracy. Nobody's out to get you. Nobody gives a shit whether you live or die. There, you feel better now? - Dennis Miller

Is that Kool-Aid in your teacup?

So, suppose you are at a gathering of like-minded people and the person next to you offers a cup of tea.

Do you accept it?

Is it safe to drink?

Look carefully at that teacup, my friend, and be certain it does not contain something a bit more sinister.

Obama Kool-Aid, perhaps.

"How" - you may ask – "could Obama Kool-Aid possibly be present at a Tea Party"?

Anyone that believes that the only people involved in the Tea Party are red-blooded American Patriots has got another think coming. I am willing to bet everything I have, and everything I'll ever have, that the opposition has an effective presence inside of the Tea Party. The same presence that was undoubtedly instrumental in every other "third party" groundswell that resulted in a splintering of votes from one of the big-two political parties.

Third parties can produce dramatic results. Their candidates can be "spoilers" -- in a close presidential election, they can take away enough votes from a major-party candidate that he loses a state's popular vote and, hence, its electoral votes and the presidency. This has happened several times in U.S. history. In 1912, former president Teddy Roosevelt's third-party candidacy took more than 27 percent and split the Republican vote, allowing Democrat Woodrow Wilson to win the presidency. In more recent times, George Wallace in 1968 and Ross Perot in 1992 took significant percentages of voters from both major parties in the general election. Many people believe that the 2000 Nader campaign took enough votes (2.8 million) away from Democratic candidate Al Gore that it caused Gore to lose the Electoral College election to George W. Bush.

You can bet your bottom dollar that the Democrats are scrambling to whip the gullible into a rabid frenzy, so crazed, and so blinded, that they will forsake the GOP completely and run their own dark-horses on a third party ticket. Divide and conquer - this is the Socialist's formula for success.

There is one thing in the Tea-Party's favor. There is no Tea Party "Party" – at least not yet. The main-stream media is constantly trying to make this an issue by declaring that there is no formal organization, and no recognized leader of the Tea-Party regulars. Over and over again we hear this tune stridently trumpeted as a short-coming. Far from being a short-coming this individualist character is the very essence of the Tea Party movement, and the very thing that makes it difficult for the Liberal-Socialist infiltrators to fracture and split Conservative voters.

As long as Tea Party Patriots resist the urge to throw the baby out with the bath water by running third-party candidates in the general election, things should be OK.

Incumbents with even a whit of political awareness must be reminded of the fact that the Tea Party - We, the People - are Constitutionalists. We believe in the Freedoms guaranteed us by the Bill of Rights - ALL of them. We are not mindless supporters of Donkeys or Elephants.