Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Great Democrat Orators

Great Orators of the Democrat Party – PAST:

"One man with courage makes a majority." ~ Andrew Jackson

"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." ~ Franklin D. Roosevelt

"The buck stops here." ~ Harry S. Truman

"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." ~ John F.Kennedy

Great Orators of the Democrat Party – TODAY:

"It depends what your definition of 'is' is.'' ~ Bill Clinton

"Those rumors are false. I believe in the sanctity of marriage." ~ John Edwards

"What difference does it make?" (re: Benghazi) ~Hillary Clinton

"I invented the Internet." ~ Al Gore

"America is, is no longer, uh, what it, uh, could be, uh, what it was once was, uh, and I say to myself, uh, I don't want that future, uh, for my children." ~ Barack Obama

"I have campaigned in all 57 states." ~ Barack Obama

"You don't need God anymore; you have us Democrats." ~ Nancy Pelosi

"Paying taxes is voluntary." ~ Sen. Harry Reid

"Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he is.”  ~ Hillary Clinton

"You have a business. You didn't build that. Someone else did!" ~ Barack Obama

"We just have to pass the Healthcare Bill to see what's in it." ~ Nancy Pelosi

(As one Doctor said: That is also the perfect definition of a stool sample. It is also what many of these bozos have in their heads instead of brains.)



"Life is tough! It's even tougher when you're stupid.'' ~ John Wayne

James Comey and The Three Stooges Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk

In addition to Curly, Moe and Larry,  there is another little known Stooge that is still alive and well.  As a matter of fact he is employed by the Obama administration as head of the FBI.

James Comey, Director of the FBI was trying to defend himself on Monday with this little gem:

" . . . the FBI does not and, should not comb through direct communications that American citizens send unless there’s probable cause to be doing so."

Holy crap - where did this maroon come from (oh yes, he was appointed by the Terrorist in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama).

I guest Jimmy failed to notice that Tashfeen Malik was not a citizen when she sought a visa to enter the USA.  Apparently Jimmy doesn't know that US citizens don't generally need visas for entry into the USA.

Additionally, considering that her own father is an Islamist activist and jihad protagonist, and that she is from Pakistan, that she attended school at a madrasa where jihadist violence against the west is fomented, etc. etc. etc, may constitute probable cause to look into her social media activity a bit closer.

Stick a fork in the FBI - its done.

Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Terrorists: "Like" Islamist Jihad on Facebook and Get Your Visa Approved - Allahu Akbar

Tashfeen Malik was "vetted" at least three times by the Feds.  She was given a clean bill of health and was welcomed into the USA with open arms.

How could Homeland Security, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, etc. etc. etc, ad nauseam have missed the fact that this avowed Islamic Terrorist was openly and notoriously spewing her lunatic jihadist intentions on Facebook?

Well, as it turns out, the DHS, INS, FBI, CIA  didn't MISS anything.

They were ordered by the Obama White House not to look at Facebook or any other social media sources for links to terrorism.
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson reportedly refused in early 2014 to end the policy though several other officials in the organization pressed for such a change.

According to ABC News:
“They could have denied this visa” if they had screened her online accounts, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said on Tuesday.

According to John Cohen, former acting under-secretary at the Department of Homeland Security and currently a national security consultant.

"The primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be embarrassing,"

Malik's background check included at least one in-person interview in Pakistan and another after marrying Syed Farook. She also had to provide fingerprints and a variety of background information. Authorities also vetted her, using intelligence and law enforcement databases.

Yet the day after the attack, Facebook found a post on a page maintained by Malik pledging her and Farook's allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State group.

Authorities have said Malik and Farook exchanged messages about jihad and martyrdom online before they were married and while she was living in Pakistan.

Ain't Political Correctness just grand?

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Bat Shit Crazy White House Shocked By Gun Sales Surge

For an hour I struggled to get my hands around this one and come up with a title that would explain, comment and perhaps entice.  There is no way for my feeble brain to grasp the utter cluelessness of the Obama administration.

The mere fact that the President's press secretary and official spokesman, conundrumly named Josh Earnest, has actually spoken the words below is beyond comprehension.

President Obama’s spokesman said Thursday that the record number of Americans seeking to buy guns in recent weeks is “a tragedy” that the White House is at a loss to explain.

“The more that we see this kind of violence on our streets, the more people go out and buy guns,” said White House press secretary Josh Earnest. “That is both ironic and tragic.”

The FBI conducted 185,345 firearms background checks on Black Friday, the most ever during a single day. The record number of gun sales came two weeks after the Islamic State’s terrorist attacks in Paris, but before the terrorist massacre in San Bernardino, California.

Asked why he thinks so many Americans are buying guns, Mr. Earnest replied, “I don’t know, I really don’t.”
(from the Washington Times)

Hello!  McFly!

The President and nearly every elected, or soon to be elected, liberal politician in the country is banging the drum for confiscation of guns from everyone save the monied elite and their storm trooper bodyguards.

Bloodthirsty Islamist psychopaths are freely roaming the streets murdering innocent men women and children while the President and his liberal ilk are singing kumbaya with  jihadis and helping the Ayatollah to build nukes.

Despite the record numbers of guns being sold, the crime rate in the United States continues to drop. The White House promulgates the notion that these gun purchases will only fuel the “epidemic of gun violence,” but there is no evidence to support their claim. Zero. In fact, it seems the more guns are purchased the more the crime rate drops.

There is no gun violence epidemic, and there never has been (except of course in Chicago and Washington D.C. where guns have been effectively illegal for decades).

I used to say there are only two choices to explain the blather coming from Obama and the Obamaphiles;  they are either stupid incompetent boobs, or they are bald-faced liars.

A third option is obviously worth considering - these loons are bat-shit crazy

Here are bat-shit crazy definitions provided by the Oxford English Dictionalry, along with the earliest citation for each:
  1. A worthless or contemptible thing; rubbish, nonsense. Cf. bullshit n. (1950 M. Shedd Return to Beach ii. 156: "I felt the minute hand of that bat shit of a Judas clock stand up to me.")
  2. Austral. Used in similative phrases as the type of something dull or uninteresting. Chiefly in boring as batshit. (1964 G. H. Johnston My Brother Jack iv. 58: "He would describe somebody as being ‘as silly as a two-bob watch’ or ‘dreary as bat-shit’.")
  3. Crazy, mad, insane. Cf. bats at bat *n*. 1 b. Orig. and freq. in to go batshit (cf. to go ape-shit at ape n. Additions). (1971 W. Calley Lieutenant Calley 104: "Most of America's males were in Korea or World War II or I. They killed, and they aren't all going batshit.")
  4. As an intensifier, esp. in batshit crazy. (1993 Toronto Life Aug. 6/4: "His mug is emblazoned with the words: full-blown bat shit crazy.")

Friday, December 11, 2015

"The Right To Bear Arms Isn’t Up For Debate" - Washington Post.

The Washington Post - you've heard of this Newspaper, right?  As the most widely circulated daily newspaper published in Washington D.C., it is both lauded and condemned as one of the most liberal propaganda institutions.  It was the Washington Post that broke the Watergate Scandal bringing down President Nixon.

Believe it or not this piece is from the Washington Post.  If this is any indication of the direction the wind is beginning to blow, then Barack and Hillary are being seen by the progressive Left as enemies of Freedom and Liberty.

The Right To Bear Arms Isn’t Up For Debate

When debating the wisdom of the Constitution’s Second Amendment, the media tends to start from the presumption that the question is purely scientific, and that the answers can — and should — be derived from statistical analyses and relentless experimentation. This approach is mistaken. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is not the product of the latest research fads or exquisitely tortured “data journalism,” but a natural extension of the Lockean principles on which this country was founded. It must be protected as such.

The Declaration of Independence presumes that all men enjoy certain inalienable rights, among them “life” and “liberty.” Practically speaking, at both the state level (as a bulwark against tyranny) and at the individual level (as a means by which to protect oneself), this necessitates the auxiliary right to the private ownership of “arms,” which, in the common law that preceded the Second Amendment, was understood to include personal weapons that could be wielded by an individual — such as the “musket and bayonet”; “sabre, holster pistols, and carbine”; and sundry “side arms.”

At the time of the American founding, it was widely understood that there was a real danger in a government’s attempting to deprive the people of what Alexander Hamilton called their “original right of self-defense.” This is why, when it came to writing the Constitution, the anti-Federalists, who feared the government’s potential to become corrupt, refused to sign on to a more powerful national government until they had been promised certain explicit protections. Then, as now, their logic was clear: It makes no sense to allow the representatives of a free people to disarm their masters.

Reacting to this argument, we often hear advocates of gun control propose that the Founders’ observations are irrelevant because they could “not have imagined the modern world.” I agree with the latter assertion: They couldn’t have. As well-read in world history as they were, there is no way that they could have foreseen just how prescient they were in insisting on harsh limitations of government power. In their time, “tyranny” was comparatively soft — their complaints focused on under-representation and the capricious restriction of ancient rights. In the past century, by contrast, tyranny involved the systematic execution of entire groups and the enslavement of whole countries. The notion that if James Madison had foreseen the 20th century he would have concluded that the Bill of Rights was too generous is laughable.

Nor could the Founders have imagined the entrenched tyranny that would arise in their own country. Washington, Jefferson, Madison and Company were hypocrites, certainly — like so many at the time they spoke of equality and liberty while indulging slavery — but the generation that met at Philadelphia did at least consider that the institution would die out peacefully. Instead, it was abolished only by bloody force, and then transmuted into something almost as abhorrent.

Conservatives who are scared of tyrants often ask, “Could it happen here?” Well, it did. Jim Crow, the KKK, lynching, legal segregation — for a period, the South was everything a free man should fear. When Ida B. Wells noted that “a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give,” she was confirming an age-old truth: The gun is a great equalizer, and the state a capricious beast.

Does everyone who uses a firearm to protect himself survive? Of course not. But as a free man, I do not consider my inalienable rights to be contingent upon my ability to exercise them successfully. I may debate freely, even if I am destined to lose the argument. I may enjoy a jury trial even if I am guilty. And I may defend my life and my liberty even if I eventually succumb.

It is from this understanding that all conversations must proceed. The Second Amendment is not “old”; it is timeless. It is not “unclear”; it is obvious. It is not “embarrassing”; it is fundamental. And, as much as anything else, it is a vital indicator of the correct relationship between the citizen and the state and a reminder of the unbreakable sovereignty of the individual. Unless those calling for greater restrictions learn to acknowledge this at the outset of any public discussion, they will continue to get nowhere in their deliberations

  --  Charles W. Cooke, 12-9-15

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Obama is a Freaking Rock Star!

Surfing the intertubes whilst slurping the morning java, I came across this gem:

"Obama has been a complete failure in just about every one of his stated goals. He is, however, a freaking rock star when it comes to accomplishing his unstated goals…"

His methodology of appearing to completely turn everything he touches or speaks of into a rancid stuttering cluster is serving him well as the ultimate distraction.

A more succinct statement on Obama's methodology is yet to be found.

Speaking of B.O. and rock stars, here is another opinion piece that further explores the "Rock Star" analogy.  While not as short nor as sweet, this commentary is worth the read - unless or course you are unable or unwilling to digest anything more than sound bites.

President Obama is exactly that, a rock star. He’s cool and hip. Yes, I know I may be dating myself here. He’s appeared on the most influential shows in America: “Late Night with Jimmy Fallon”, “The Late Show with David Letterman”, “The Late, Late Show with Craig Ferguson” and “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno”. These are the shows that many Americans look to in deciding who they should support, who is cool, and who is not. These are the shows that help a lot of Americans make their decisions on national issues.

Obama is stylish and at ease in a crowd. He can sing with the best of them. He’s performed at many gatherings of loyal fans and listeners. Tens of thousands have come to see his shows. He knows just how to throw out all the right words to his worshipful, mesmerized followers. He says all the things they want to hear. They listen intently to his pearls of wisdom, and admire the eloquent way in which he speaks each and every one. He puts on one of the best shows in D.C. and throughout the nation.
What? You don’t believe me. Think about it. At the end of every show he smashes his guitar into the stage to the roars of applause. Wait a minute. Your right he’s not that kind of a rock star. He’s the President of the United States. This is an important point.

Think about going to see your favorite band or solo artist in concert. You enjoy the show, but when it is over it is over. At the end of the show the rock star moves on to the next town, then the next. Each time it’s a great show even though it’s the same in each town with the same words.

Now, imagine you stuck around after all the faithful fans have left. After the show you would see the aftermath of the concert. What would remain? You would find a stadium littered with trash. On the floor would be the remnants of discarded food and wrappers, puddles of spilled soda, alcohol, and urine. The clean-up crew would swoop in to clean up the mess. The road crew would descend on the stage like a pack of hungry wolves, pack up the equipment and get it to the next show in the next town for the next waiting crowd.

The rock star and stage crew would not be concerned with the mess left behind, the condition of the stadium or who would have to clean up the mess, or even if it would be cleaned up. That would be someone else’s problem, not theirs. Besides, everyone got their monies worth, didn’t they? If you were the last fan to leave the stadium, seeing the litter left blowing in the wind, you would probably feel a sense of emptiness. The rock star is gone and you are left alone.
Now picture America as that stadium and President Obama as the rock star. America’s citizens are the crowd. Some had a great time at the show. But afterwards as they survey the mess left behind in their country in the wake of Barack Obama—rock star—many are left feeling empty and alone. At the end we are feeling buyer’s remorse. But like all “good things” the show must come to an end and the star must move on.

But with this scenario, there is no clean-up crew. There were large new signs as we entered that said everyone entering must do their part in cleaning the stadium at the end of the show. But many of the fans don’t stick around for the clean-up. They don’t care to be held responsible for the mess they helped create and certainly don’t want anyone to think they were responsible for any part of it. The good times were had and now it’s time to go home. Someone else can clean up. That’s the way it’s always been. But there will be some who stick around, perhaps only a few but some.
At the end of President Obama’s stage performance he will leave the stadium after waving to his fans and telling everyone he is focusing on jobs with a laser-like focus to the roars of the crowd. He’s going to at least get each of us a fair shot at one. He’s going to transform America into what he believes it should be and get you your fair share. And if there was something you didn’t like about the show you could certainly blame the last guy for that. President Obama is not responsible for any problems with the show. He’s above that, he’s a rock star.

Many American’s like the pretty words, and always want to hear more. They want to be told how everything bad is someone else’s fault, never theirs. High unemployment is the fault of his predecessor, but it’s turning around due solely to the driving force of the rock star—the President. He say it’s just gonna take more time. The season of recovery is almost here. Oh, that’s right that already come and gone.

Do we as Americans realize that after the President Obama World Tour is over in 2016 the biggest clean-up in American history will be required? When President Obama leaves the stage for the last time we will have a higher national debt than ever before. Over thirty percent of the entire debt will be from his terms in office. It already is. He will be responsible for it. But the question is? Will American blame him or hold the next president responsible?

In December 2007 the debt every American, including infants owed toward the national debt was under thirty thousand dollars. As this writing the debt every American owes is $52,583.00. We are “progressing” toward doubling what is owed per person in just over four years. What will it be when Obama’s term is over? Are you prepared to pay up? I’m not!

President Obama has passed out gifts to his loyal followers at each of his shows. The problem is he charged it all on your credit card. And the bill is now coming due. Will America’s status as a super power and our foreign relations be damaged during his time on the stage? Will we devolve from the “sleeping giant” that entered World War II to the paper tiger he created? Will our military be weaker? Will we need those horses and bayonets then? Will North Korea and Iran have nuclear weapons before he leaves office? Will more American diplomats be sacrificed to prove we have Al-Qaeda on the run or on its heels?

Sadly it seems most Americans do not realize that there will be a price to pay. But there will be. And we have yet to see what our portion of the bill will be. What will he leave for the next president to clean up? Will the next President have anything to work with when he takes office? Every American must understand that in the end those in any political office are not going to have to pay the bill they have run up—you are. The debt is on your credit card. It will be me and you, each of us who will have the bill delivered personally. We are approaching the point where the can can’t be kicked any farther down the road.
My advice to every American is this. Make sure you vote in 2014. It may be the second most important vote in your lifetime. Let’s start a voting revolution. Let’s really change Washington. Let’s rally behind the motto: Dump the Chump. Especially, if they have grown old in office as so many have. I don’t know about you but I never wanted a rock star as president. I was hoping for the real thing. I was hoping for change for America’s future. I was hoping for a change for the better. Now go buy those tickets to the next concert.

by Craig Petree 2-27-13

Monday, December 7, 2015

Obama's Oval Office Speech Summary

Guns:  bad
Muslims:  good
ISIS:  not muslims

Judge Jeanine Pirro: Get a Gun


There was a direct video of Judge Pirro's December 5 opener here, however both You Tube and Blogger seem to have blocked this due to the conservative content.  I have provided a link to her show HERE where you may still be able to view this block-busting oration.

Justice with Judge Jeanine is a show that I don't usually watch.  However, I was surfing the cable tube on December 5th and I caught her opening monologue.

Straight non-PC talk.

I love it.

Saturday, December 5, 2015

No-Fly List Should Become the No-Walk List.

B.O. just said this in his weekly address to the nation:

"right now, people on the No-Fly list can walk into a store and buy a gun.  That is insane.  If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun.  And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now."

If someone is so dangerous as to be banned from airplanes, they are also dangerous enough to be banned from walking among the rest of us.

If Obama has a list of terrorists why is it a secret?

Why are these known-by-name-and-address terrorists not locked up in Guantanamo?

Could it be that these so-called terror watch lists or no-fly lists are a whole lot of smoke and mirrors? Or perhaps they are actually the Obama Enemies lists.  If that is the case, I suspect that these secret lists must have about 250 million names, since that number approximates the millions of US citizens that have no faith or trust whatsoever in Obama or his administrative minions.