Friday, August 12, 2016

Murderous Holsters are Killing Innocent Bodega Dudes

The InterWebs are all atwitter about the NYC Cops and their dastardly gun holsters.

Those holsters must be banned to protect innocent citizens.

Either that or perhaps they could make the commission of a crime a criminal act punishable by punishment.

Here is the lowdown on the Snatch-grab-and murder:

In the predawn hours of Aug. 9, police officers were flagged down regarding a dispute at the A&M Deli at 230 East 198th Street in New York City. During the ensuing incident, as detailed by NYPD Assistant Chief Larry Nikunen, Efraim Guzman, 30, was able to remove an officer’s gun from the holster and shoot a bodega worker he had previously been in a dispute with across the street. Shot by officers twice, Guzman was taken to St. Barnabas Hospital.

“Obviously we are going to review all the tactics involved. But looking at the video, Mr. Guzman made a very fast move and basically ripped the gun from the officer’s holster,” said Nikunen.
Oh - Did anyone mention that the Innocent and hard working convenience store operator is dead?  Dead at the hands of a criminal.

It is not the holster's fault.
It is not the gun's fault.
It is the criminal's fault

So why the hubbub? Well, this right here proves that no matter what gun control law is put in place, even if the "Only Ones" are the only ones to own them, criminals will still get their hands on them - just like one did here, and they will still kill another person - just as they did here.

By waging this foolishness about holsters, the controllers grab a hold of the narrative, and keep the blame on the item, so that blame and responsibility are NOT pointed squarely at the individual criminal themselves. Remember, collectivists always have to start from the collectivist position and find a reason, any reason, to protect their collectivism, which must avoid individual person responsibility assigned.

It is not the holster, or the gun. It is the criminal. And only the criminal.

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Obama Believes that Shooting Someone is the Only Gun Crime.

Read that title again.  Then read what he just said as a justification for commuting the sentences of dozens and dozens of criminals in federal penitentiaries that used guns in aggravated felonies.

This week President Obama commuted the sentences of 214 violent felons serving hard time.

The total included no less than 56 that were in prison on charges that included violations of federal firearm laws.

To the President, when asked at a daily news conference, it all came down to whether they were using the firearms or not.

“There may have been a situation where a kid at 18, was a member of a gang, had a firearm, did not use it in the offense that he was charged in, there’s no evidence that he used it in any violent offense, it’s still a firearms charge– an enhancement– but he didn’t use it,” said Obama, “He’s now 48 or 38, 20 years later, and has an unblemished prison record, has gone back to school, got his GED, has gone through drug treatment, has the support of the original judge that presided, the support of the U.S. Attorney that charged him, support of the warden, has a family that loves him and in that situation, the fact that he had 20 years earlier an enhancement because he had firearm is different from a situation where he had an armed robbery and shot somebody.”
Now that you've read Obama's rationale for letting these thugs off the hook, why do you suppose he has such a strong a jones to keep good, honest, law abiding Americans from exercising their God-Given, and Constitution guaranteed, Right to Keep and Bear arms?

Why then are there any laws against merely possessing any firearm by anyone, anywhere, in the USA?

After all; isn't that what this phrase unambiguously says?

"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

I know the answer:  Obama, along with Hillary and most of their Democrat sycophants don't believe it's the PERSON who's responsible for the crime, it's the GUN!  Either that or they are two-faced hypocritical elitist nazi jackasses.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Obama establishes "Arrest Free Zones" for Illegals and Terrorists

Nope - I'm not making this up.  It is not a SNL skit.  I did not get this from "The Onion"

Here is a direct quote from Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies.
“It's schizophrenic. What the Obama administration has done is to create sanctuaries for illegal aliens and to publicize them. That is fine for a social welfare agency, but not for a law enforcement agency. No law enforcement agency would ever want to broadcast where lawbreakers can go to be shielded from the consequences of their actions.”

Don't believe me?  here is the complete text from a recent story that you will not see on ABC, CBS or NBC - and Especially CNN (aka the Clinton News Network)

Border Patrol's website offers advice on eluding the Border Patrol

Safety and sanctuary can generally be found at schools, churches, hospitals and protests, where Customs and Border Protection agents are barred under a "sensitive locations policy" from carrying out their duty of enforcing border security. In fact, the agency’s website states that actions at such locations can only be undertaken in an emergency or with a supervisor’s approval.

“The policies are meant to ensure that ICE and CBP officers and agents exercise sound judgment when enforcing federal law at or focused on sensitive locations, to enhance the public understanding and trust, and to ensure that people seeking to participate in activities or utilize services provided at any sensitive location are free to do so, without fear or hesitation,” the government website states in both English and Spanish.

Agents are not allowed to contact a suspected illegal immigrant in a "sensitive location" under the department's guidelines. (Associated Press)

While the explanation is apparently meant to show the deference Customs and Border Protection agents show to sensitive societal institutions, critics, including the Media Research Center, say it also tells illegal border crossers where to go if they are being pursued. Agents are barred from interviewing, searching or arresting suspected illegal immigrants in such locations.

“So, almost any illegal alien can escape arrest by either walking with a second person (a march), attending some type of class, or finding a nearby church, medical facility or school bus stop,” the Center wrote in a post bringing the advisory to light.

A “Frequently Asked Questions” section explains in detail what the Customs and Border Patrol’s parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, considers safe zones for illegal immigrants.
Schools, such as known and licensed day cares, pre-schools and other early learning programs; primary schools; secondary schools; post-secondary schools up to and including colleges and universities; as well as scholastic or education-related activities or events, and school bus stops that are marked and/or known to the officer, during periods when school children are present at the stop;
Medical treatment and health care facilities, such as hospitals, doctors’ offices, accredited health clinics, and emergent or urgent care facilities;
Places of worship, such as churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples;
Religious or civil ceremonies or observances, such as funerals and weddings;
During public demonstration, such as a march, rally, or parade.

Critics of the Obama administration’s immigration policies have long complained that it undermines the mission of border enforcement by imposing rules on agents that they say leave them unable to do their jobs.

“This administration has systematically and maliciously attacked and deconstructed all phases of border enforcement,” said Dan Stein, president of Federation for American Immigration Reform. “It’s to the point now where virtually nobody has to go home. ICE is no longer carrying out its core mission, of finding, identifying and removing illegal aliens from the country.

“Agents are in a state of despair,” Stein added. “They are being turned into nursemaids, chaperones and bus drivers.”

Telling people suspected of breaking the law where they can seek refuge makes no sense, said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies.

“It's schizophrenic," Vaughan said. "What the Obama administration has done is to create sanctuaries for illegal aliens and to publicize them. That is fine for a social welfare agency, but not for a law enforcement agency. No law enforcement agency would ever want to broadcast where lawbreakers can go to be shielded from the consequences of their actions.”

The site does say the “sensitive locations policy” does not apply to places directly along the border, but warns its own agents that if they plan to move on a suspect in such a location near the border they “are expected to exercise sound judgment and common sense while taking appropriate action, consistent with the goals of this policy.”

The CBP website also provides a toll-free number and email address to allow illegal immigrants to report possible violations of the “sensitive locations” policy.